When Caregiving Gets Misnamed: Codependency and Maternal Instinct

What if "Codependency" isn't a flaw, but a distorted expression of maternal instinct in a culture that devalues caregiving?

8/22/20251 min read

Jade in a green dress and boots holding baby Nova by flow bush, representing maternal instinct and caregiving
Jade in a green dress and boots holding baby Nova by flow bush, representing maternal instinct and caregiving

Codependency is maternal instinct in disguise.

What we often pathologize as “codependency” might actually be the natural drive to bond, nurture, and stay closely connected — which is maternal instinct at its core.

Maternal instinct is about deep attunement: noticing subtle shifts in someone you love, wanting to protect them, and meeting their needs. Psychology frames “codependency” in the opposite light — as unhealthy over-involvement, self-sacrifice, or basing your worth on another person.

But both grow from the same root: a powerful biological and emotional orientation toward caregiving and connection. In a society that doesn’t support mothers, that instinct gets misapplied in adult relationships. The natural channel for it — safe, supported caregiving — is missing or devalued.

So maybe codependency isn’t a flaw. Maybe it’s maternal instinct, distorted by a culture that has forgotten how to honor it.